Please complete your profile to unlock commenting and other important features.

Please select your date of birth for special perks on your birthday. Your username will be your unique profile link and will be publicly used in comments.
MTL Blog Pro

This is a Pro feature.

Time to level up your local game with MTL Blog Pro.

Pro

$5/month

$40/year

  • Everything in the Free plan
  • Ad-free reading and browsing
  • Unlimited access to all content including AI summaries
  • Directly support our local and national reporting and become a Patron
  • Cancel anytime.
For Pro members only Pro
Summary

An Open Letter Slams Quebec's Curfew & Says It Could Have Grim Consequences

"Will the government continue to put Quebec in a box apart from the rest of Canada every winter by banning the free movement of people in the evening and at night?"

Senior Editor

Quebec's second curfew could have grim consequences, according to a group of 13 professors, researchers and professionals. In an open letter published on December 30, 2021, the group takes aim at the Quebec government's decision to impose new restrictions on nighttime travel.

The 13 individuals hold positions at McGill, UQAM, Université de Montréal, New York University (NYU), Université Saint-Paul, the Association québécoise pour la promotion de la santé des personnes utilisatrices de drogues (AQPSUD), the Association des juristes progressistes (AJP) and the Ligue des droits et libertés.

They say they decided to speak out against the new curfew in light of the "difficult, even traumatic" effects of the first one, which lasted over four months, from January to May 2021.

"It seems that after 21 months of health crisis, the Legault government is still caught in its inability to plan, foresee, prevent, mitigate," the letter reads.

While the letter authors agree that the rapid spread of infections calls for "greater precautions in social life," they charge that the curfew only serves to threaten Quebecers' health while giving the impression that the government is taking action to respond to the public health threat.

They suggest that instead, the imposition of a curfew "erodes" the public's "support for effective health measures."

The authors further question the effectiveness of a curfew; 93% of Omicron wave outbreaks as of December 15, they say, occurred in schools, daycares and workplaces.

"Since the Legault government has done almost nothing to address ventilation and general air quality in these settings," they wrote, "it is not surprising that they have become hotbeds for the spread of the airborne virus as the fall of 2021 unfolds."

The comments echo those of opposition leader Dominique Anglade, whose office published her own response shortly after Premier François Legault announced the new curfew.

Saying she was "flabbergasted" by the decision, Anglade criticized the Legault government for not working to expand rapid test availability and acting more quickly to install new air filtration systems in the province's schools.

"The measures announced by François Legault are an admission of failure in his management of the pandemic and proof that he has lost control," Anglade concluded.

Explore this list   👀

    • Senior Editor

      Thomas MacDonald was the Senior Editor of MTL Blog. He received a B.A. with honours from McGill University in 2018 and worked as a Writer and Associate Editor before entering his current role. He is proud to lead the MTL Blog team and to provide its readers with the information they need to make the most of their city.

    Montreal Jobs New

    Post jobView more jobs

    A cozy seaside gem near Montreal was just named North America's 'most peaceful' town

    Canadian towns dominated the list, claiming five of the top six spots.