In December, five McGill University students penned a petition calling on the university to "make a statement and take action" against a fellow student, described as a first-year male, who they accused of sexual assault. The petition amassed 50,000 signatures in three days. \n\n\nThis article contains graphic content that might not be suitable for some readers. \n\n\n"Many girls have come forward with their stories and evidence of his violent, demeaning actions and they deserve justice," the petition read. \nEditor's Choice: Canada's Getting A New Holiday Dedicated To Truth & Reconciliation\n\n \nFive months later, McGill has issued one statement and launched three investigations. But the accusers — who asked to be called "the girls" to protect their safety — told MTL Blog they've been left in the dark.\nThey said they received no updates on how investigations are progressing or whether the accused is facing any penalties.\nMeanwhile, they said the student has continued attending classes.\nMcGill has been following its protocol for investigations into allegations of sexual assault — but this protocol has left the girls and other students in limbo for the majority of the school year.\nWhat happened?\n"We can't feel safe on campus with him lurking around, viewing us as prey," one of the girls, Eva*, told MTL Blog.\nMost of the girls were minors at the time of the alleged assaults, as was the accused student, whose name has not been released by the university or the police.\nEva told MTL Blog the accused student frequented bars near McGill residences where he would "talk to, touch and kiss [girls] who were drunk," and that he would persistently "beg" female students to "hook up."\nIn written testimonies shared with MTL Blog, each of the girls outlined how the accused student sexually assaulted them both off and on campus.\nOne of them said the accused sexually assaulted her when she was "completely blacked out" from alcohol.\n\nWhat was McGill's reaction?\nMcGill responded to the December petition within three days. A statement written by Deputy Provost of Student Life and Learning Fabrice Labeau assured the student body and the general public that McGill was "looking into the matter."\n"Our foremost concern right now is student wellbeing," Labeau wrote. He expressed what he called a "steadfast commitment to a campus community where everyone feels safe."\nThough none of the girls had formally reported their assaults to McGill at the time — something Eva said was because "the resources weren't publicized and the social consequences for reporting were immense" — that changed by the end of December. \nEva said one of the girls filed a police report, and three of the girls filed complaints with McGill, initiating three internal investigations. However, neither the police nor the university was able to confirm details of these investigations to MTL Blog.\nA month later, the university had not issued any new statements nor updated the girls involved, Eva said.\nMTL Blog asked Cynthia Lee, McGill's associate director of media relations, to confirm the status of the investigations in February. She said that according to McGill's Policy Against Sexual Violence, "when a formal report is made, the University must immediately appoint an external Special Investigator to conduct a full and impartial investigation." \nShe also said "the entirety of this process is covered by confidentiality regulations," and that she could not disclose any further information.\n\nHow did other McGill students react?\nThe silence surrounding the allegations began to disturb other McGill students who said they had to interact with the accused student in their classes.\nAnna Ni told MTL Blog she attended an online psychology course with the accused student, where she said he would participate in group discussions while he was part of the ongoing investigations.\nShe said McGill's ambiguous response to the allegations made her feel "small and voiceless."\n"I am grateful for the fact that McGill has resources that can help students struggling with this situation, but McGill's vagueness in their [statement] gave me the impression that they were not actively taking care of this situation," she said.\nIn a screenshot Ni took of her classmates discussing the accused student's presence in the course via group chat — which she shared with MTL Blog — one student asked, "I thought the school took care of this? Why is he still allowed to study?"\n\n \n \n \n \n \n MTL Blog\n \n \n \nAmrita Kaur, a first-year student unaffiliated with the girls, told MTL Blog that McGill's communications to the student body following the incident — mainly emails consisting of links to support resources — felt "empty."\nShe emailed the Office of the Dean of Students to express her "extreme disappointment" in the school for allowing the accused student to attend classes "as if nothing ever happened." \n"Now I wonder if it's true [...] all great institutions sweep sexual assault under the rug," she wrote in her email to McGill, which she forwarded to MTL Blog.\nShe said she did not receive a response from the university.\nLee told MTL Blog that at McGill, until an investigation is complete, "disciplinary actions cannot be taken pre-emptively […] however, interim measures are put in place to ensure the safety and wellbeing of those directly affected."\nPossible accommodations include late withdrawal from a course or a change in residence — but they only apply to survivors. \nMTL Blog found that according to the Policy against Sexual Violence, the university can take pre-emptive disciplinary action if "there may be a risk of harm to any Member of the University Community." \nMTL Blog asked Lee if the fact that the accused student was still attending classes meant that the university did not see him as posing a threat to university community members. \nShe did not directly respond to the question.\n\nWhat is the 'Code of Silence'?\nThere is a legal reason why the university claims it is limited regarding what it can divulge about sexual assault investigations.\nBill 64, Quebec's Act respecting Access to documents held by public bodies and the Protection of personal information (CQLR c. A-2.1), forbids the province's CEGEPs and universities from disclosing private information like the details of sexual assault investigations — meaning they can't even inform victims of the penalties imposed on their assailant.\nIn Quebec, this is known as the "Code of Silence."\nBrooklyn Frizzle, vice-president of the Students' Society of McGill University (SSMU), told MTL Blog they believe universities use this law as a "scapegoat" to justify a lack of transparency in cases of sexual violence. \nFrizzle said this wasn't the first time students' questions about a case involving sexual misconduct were left unanswered.\n"I've lost track of how many emails to the Dean of Students or to the Provost that I've seen, to which there was no response because the university can't legally give a response," they said.\nLast year, representatives from l'Université du Québec à Montréal (UQAM) started a petition to amend the Act so post-secondary institutions could "inform victims of the disciplinary measures taken against their aggressors."\n"Evidence shows that [the Act] contributes to victims' lack of trust in institutional channels, since it keeps the person most affected by the complaint from accessing crucial information for their healing process and to their sense of safety at school and/or work," the petition read.\nMcGill's Policy states that all investigations should be conducted within 90 days. According to this timeline, the girls' investigations should have ended by April.\nBut even when the investigations are complete, the Code of Silence means the girls cannot be informed of the penalties that may or may not be imposed on the accused student.\nAs Lee told MTL Blog, "details or updates concerning particular cases cannot be provided to anyone outside those immediately involved."\nThis means other students won't know if they can expect to see the accused student in their classes again next semester. \n\nCould the 'Code of Silence' change?\nWhile the public may never know if and how the accused student has been disciplined, McGill's Annual Report on the Policy against Sexual Violence gives some indication of the number of investigations the school has conducted. \nMcGill provided MTL Blog with a copy of the Annual Report, which specifies that, in 2020, eight of nine completed investigations yielding "a finding of sexual violence" resulted in disciplinary action.\nThese actions included "admonishment and conduct probation, formal reprimand [and/or] cease and desist communication and contact orders," but it's unclear which actions applied to which investigations.\nOut of 18 incidents of sexual violence reported to the university in 2020, 83% were submitted by women. Just one report was submitted by a man, while two were submitted anonymously.\nIn May, a National Assembly committee presented its findings on possibly amending Bill 64. However, whether the amendments pass remains to be seen. For now, those involved can only know that the investigations are finished.\nA 2016 Université Laval study found that 36.9% of Quebec students, faculty and staff experienced some form of sexual violence by another person affiliated with their university.\n"It feels constant, like there's [always] some big allegation of sexual violence that we're talking about that we're trying to pressure the university to respond to," Frizzle said.\n"It's just the name [that] changes every semester."\n\n\n*The source's name has been changed at their request to protect their safety.\nWith files from Ilana Belfer, MTL Blog.\nIf you require resources or assistance surrounding sexual assault in Quebec, the CAVAC helpline is available 24/7. Those who may need support can call 1-866-532-2822. Other crisis lines and 24/7 options can be found at The Lifeline Canada.